Criminal Justice Theories

CRIMINAL JUSTICE THEORIESAnalysis of Social conquer speculation and Labeling possible action[Name][University][Professor][Subject][Date]IntroductionA intelligent philosopher once remarked that reality is by nature good gibbet , according to him is the result of ignorance or the lack of knowledge . When shame is seatted it is because of the limitation and imperfection of his present knowledge . though it may be true that no composition is morally corrupt by nature , Socrates explanation of the presence of miserable offence and evil in our society does not cause to reception the question why people offend and commit iniquity . Why is it that regular the highest ranking CEOs of multinational companies set to detach money from their investors and stockholders ? It does not explain why even educated people become criminal offenders and violators of the law . This could exactly retrieve that there is more(prenominal) to crime than just the righteousness or badness of the individualIt is because of this reason that Sociologists have turned to new(prenominal) causes or factors that may influence human look into committing crimes . This has resulted in several(prenominal) theories attempting to explain crime and deviance . These theories are Social concur Theory and Labeling Theory which will be discussed in this essaySocial tick TheorySocial Control Theory proceeds from the assumption that man is by nature broken-down and is capable of committing crimes . Instinct drives human sort to commit crime . Travis Hirschi , the proponent of Social Control Theory , asserts that despite man s inclinations to commit crime it can be controlled and his behavior can be regulated so as to make man conform to certain social rules or laws . He says that this could be done by strengthening man s social bonds with the people around him Th! ese social bonds include chemical bond , commitment , involvement and belief .

The stronger these social bonds are , the more committed a person is to conventional activities and the greater his attachments to his parents and friends , the fine likely it is that he will engage in squeaking behavior . Conversely , once this social bond is thinned then it is likely that individuals will engaged in run-down behavior (Reginald J . Alston , 1995 ,.3Thus , according to E .A . Ross the most in force(p) means for controlling and regulating behavior is not the social function of laws and the threats of punishment exactly the belief and value systems that helps man come after with the rulesLabeling TheoryLabeling Theory did not give much attention to crimes still to the labels that people attach to certain individuals or to certain acts . For suit all people have at one eon violated rules . But not all persons are denominate as criminals . Only those people who are actually caught or whose deviant acts are disclosed to the public that are considered criminals . A person who is labeled as a criminal begins to reflect of himself as a criminal and begins to associate with other deviants olibanum reinforcing the stigma that society attaches to deviants . According to the results of a study...If you want to start up a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay