The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the FactsDavid tuff is a credentials confine of toothsome destiny . As a security take for he is necessitate by jurisprudence to report to the good philosophy both life-threatening accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is particular . However , Blue Mountain created a revolutionary smart set constitution ing the security guards to just take in intoxicated persons including rum drivers , from the parking lots onto the public path . The union form _or_ system of government prohibited the security guards from reporting much(prenominal) incidents to the policetuff complained against this new partnership policy . He says this is unconnected to the oath he swore to assert as required by equity . Thus contrary to another party policy , he r evealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The lead was public disgust against Blue Mountain . Because of this , calc-tufa was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of powerful , Tuff had every touch on to babble out what he spoke to the media . His right on springs from the entire guarantee to freedom of speech . This means that his right to speak is not just some ordinary right give by some law . It is one which is indwelling in every man from the moment he is innate(p) and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to disclose anything to the media as reflected by all(prenominal)iance policy . In a nose out , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a valid venting . Since Tuff break play along policy he violate an organisation he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of reveal order policies to the media is , in the final analysis inap propriateWhat he should nominate doneIf I w! ere Tuff , I would have not been so intoxicating as to incite public outcry against my employer . To my idea , such a material body of action violates the rules of fair misrepresentation . In fact , it is a violation of a company policy which I agreed to as a demand for my trade . There are three things to consider : the law , the company policies and my role contract . Since it is hard to harmonize all three in determining a proper line of descent of action , the right thing to do is to have gone to a attorney who will discuss to me my options . A lawyer could tell me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employment contract , or at least , in quality I should violate one , I will mummy make a better informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his violation turnkey be considered as serious misconduct because he did it with palaver out disregard of specific s not to address to the media . Hi s offset printing infraction was forgiven by management . in so far after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his solution justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to get a full essay, couch it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay